Subject	NSX was a lot more new, Rx7s are really cheap>>>
Posted by	Zster (Z-less) on January 11, 2002 at 12:29 AM
	This message has been viewed 65 times.
In Reply To	then why is the SUPRA still so much? or RX7?? posted by Pure-Evil on January 10, 2002 at 11:59 PM
Message	they only started making rx7s in 93, and 93 Rx7s sell for less than 93 TTs, as far as the books are concerned. But you will see a lot more cheaper ones (Rx7s), there are the few that are priced high tho, but those are by real proud owners, which is probably more so in the 7 community b/c most Z owners aren't very bright when it comes to car worth (everyone lets their cars go for cheap). As for Poopras, they are more rare, therefore the price does work for them. I think more than ever because of Fast and the Furious publicity. So It all falls into place. The NSX was at ~25k more than a TT when new, all those damn titanium and aluminum parts ;) Salah 1993 300ZX Twin Turbo ^Sold :( "Happiness is not around the corner, it is the corner!"
Follow Ups	You guys think the Z32 value will decrease or increase - intol 22:06:44 01/10/02 no questions on this one... - madman99 22:22:09 01/10/02 Agreed>> - Josh H.(The Evil One) 22:27:52 01/10/02 Banks dont give big loan value, on old cars.. (n/m) - xaviar(Mos Def) 22:34:19 01/10/02 I wouln't call the Z32 a "mass produced vehicle"-- - z-extreme 22:36:22 01/10/02 Damn Na' Z's!!! ;) only ~12000 turbo cars imported! Then we - i300zxtt 22:45:24 01/10/02 out of those 70,000 how many of them are wrecked or - chivas(NFC!!!) 22:50:43 01/10/02 I was just asking because... - intol 23:12:12 01/10/02 The only thing I disagree with is the Z31 comparison - Only1Z 23:14:49 01/10/02 plus the z31 didnt stand the test of time - intol 23:16:07 01/10/02 then why is the SUPRA still so much? or RX7?? - Pure-Evil 23:59:53 01/10/02 NSX was a lot more new, Rx7s are really cheap>>> - Zster (Z-less) 00:29:00 01/11/02 & probably coz of the Supra movie "Slow & The Curious" ;-) (n/m) - AlanM 17:40:27 01/11/02 Stay the same (n/m) - Kevin (Jax) 08:49:45 01/11/02 New one is ugly (n/m) - serv40 22:37:10 01/10/02 >>>agreed!<<< (n/m) - Quiki(the Narc) 22:41:52 01/10/02 For sure. (n/m) - DanZMan 23:13:28 01/10/02 Dunno. But in 20 years I'm gonna see what a 95tt is worth... (n/m) - uneaZy rider 23:29:34 01/10/02 if you're thinking of getting a 'collector' value... - madman99 23:36:00 01/10/02 I think your dead wrong. The 95 is the best and rarest TT. (n/m) - uneaZy rider 23:43:48 01/10/02 Plus it's the 25th ann. year. I'm not in it for the money>>> - uneaZy rider 23:46:20 01/10/02 i agree.. it's most desired bc it's the anniv edition (n/m) - ForceFedTT 00:43:50 01/11/02 95 is best, but 96 is the rarest (least produced) (n/m) - MugenRacer 00:00:58 01/11/02 Forgive me but... Why's a 95 the best again? (n/m) - wildestyet 00:09:04 01/11/02 so you think my #32 TT serial ...00000032 will be worth more - Pure-Evil 00:02:38 01/11/02 only if it is all original. #s and authenticity go hand>> - Zster (Z-less) 00:33:13 01/11/02 Even though the TT is a "Blue Chip" investment, --> - ZFreak (Link Whore) 23:51:18 01/10/02 New "Z" not the same - SkiFly01 00:23:07 01/11/02 I guess u guys don't understand what i really meant. - intol 01:53:53 01/11/02 Your Z is worth 3500 now, 1500 when the new Z comes out. - Jack B. 03:21:08 01/11/02 sadly, Jack B. is (directionally) correct on this one - madman99 09:18:39 01/11/02 Note to self: "Ignore Jack B. Ignore Jack B. Ignore ..." (n/m) - Z-Jay (Edmonton) 09:28:00 01/11/02 the worst thing is that even if - Keepsake 03:51:47 01/11/02 increase (n/m) - F8IZHIS 06:19:41 01/11/02
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.